Justice Department drops bid to force California to set aside disputed ballots
Court Watch
The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday asked a federal court to dismiss its own lawsuit seeking to stop California from counting about 20,000 ballots that the department claimed were sent to noncitizens, until the voters' immigration status could be confirmed.
The request came days after Republicans suffered heavy losses in the midterm elections and roughly a week before a scheduled hearing at which a court-appointed special master was to review the accuracy of the government's list of alleged noncitizens. California officials have argued that the list is outdated and includes eligible voters, a view the presiding federal judge also expressed in a sharply worded order rejecting the government's request.
Ballots already counted
The lawsuit was filed in mid-October, after ballots had been mailed to all 23 million registered voters in the state and hundreds of thousands had already been processed. Once processed, ballots are fully anonymized.
As of early Friday, state election officials reported about 9 million ballots processed, with nearly 5 million still to be counted. In its motion, the Justice Department said that by the time of the hearing, the challenged ballots would already be irreversibly mixed with valid ones, leaving the relief it sought no longer available and making voluntary dismissal necessary.
U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, named the special master in late October, shortly after allowing California to move forward with its election as planned. In his order, Carter wrote that separating ballots at such a late point could disenfranchise citizens and would cause serious disruption to the midterm elections. The special master was also set to examine whether California election officials actually had a way to separate the ballots.
Department vows to keep pursuing cases
The case had been a centerpiece of the Trump administration's push to exert more control over elections run by the states. President Donald Trump has claimed, without offering evidence, that noncitizen voting is widespread, while available data shows such cases are extremely rare.
Justice Department spokesperson Kiersten Pels repeated the department's earlier claim that California chose to protect illegal voters by refusing to set the ballots aside, and asserted that thousands of likely noncitizens remain on the state's voter rolls and cast ballots in the 2026 elections. In a Friday evening statement, the department said it would continue to pursue suspected election law violations through other cases.
The department also moved to support a separate lawsuit, filed in May, alleging that California violates federal voting laws by failing to adequately remove ineligible voters from its rolls. Bill Essayli, the top federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, said the effort is part of a broader commitment to use every available civil and criminal tool to ensure that only eligible U.S. citizens vote.
The Justice Department is still involved in litigation with several immigrant and voting rights organizations seeking to restrict how it uses its list of suspected noncitizens. Separately, California prosecutors have arrested more than 30 noncitizens in recent weeks on charges of illegally registering to vote, and some are also accused of voting in past elections.
Related listings
-
Hong Kong activist Joshua Wong sentenced to 10 more years in prison
Court Watch 11/05/2026A Hong Kong court on Thursday handed prominent pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong an additional 10-year prison term under the national security law imposed by Beijing, a ruling critics say reflects the sweeping crackdown on the city's once-vibrant de...
-
Judge orders 30-year prison sentence for key figure in Minnesota food fraud
Court Watch 11/01/2026A Minnesota restaurant owner has been sentenced to 30 years in federal prison for his role in a massive fraud scheme that stole millions of dollars from a government-funded child nutrition program during the COVID-19 pandemic.Salim Said, the operator...
-
US bans imports from 3 Chinese biotech companies over forced labor allegations
Court Watch 10/30/2026The Trump administration announced Wednesday that it will block imports from Chinese biotechnology firm BGI Group and two of its affiliates, citing alleged links to forced labor in Xinjiang, China's far-western ethnic region.Beginning Thursday, U.S. ...
Victorville CA DUI Lawyers - Drunk Driving Defense Attorney
The outcome of a DUI defense will have a long-term effect on anyone’s life, making the decision to receive legal representation an easy one. The fact is, most people accused of a DUI are first offenders with no criminal background. Whether this is your first run in with the law or you have had previous convictions, you are in need of a DUI defense attorney.
If you fail a sobriety test or have a blood alcohol level above 0.8%, you are considered to be driving under the influence in which you will be arrested. During this time you will be read your Miranda rights and it is crucial to exercise your right to remain silent. As they say, “anything you say can and will be held against you in court.” The courtroom takes no mercy on drunk drivers and any statement you make during your arrest will only damage your case.
The charges you are facing for a DUI range from fines, a 12-month suspension on your license and worst-case scenario, prison time. Your attorney will be able to analyze your situation to decide the best way to go about your case.
Our Victorville CA DUI defense attorneys know the tricky ways to challenge all of the DUI tests and know how to claim improper collection of evidence. We will be able to negotiate on your behalf and free you from charges and help you keep your drivers license. The DUI process can last up to several months, we can make this process easier on you.
